Friday, March 15, 2013

Arizona Mobile Dental Statue–A look back, and peek ahead

At a February 4, 2011 meeting, discussions were held on HB 2233, a Bill introduced by Representative Doris Goodale (R-Kingman) to regulate Mobile Dental Facilities in the state. A stakeholder’s meeting had been held just prior to the meeting; attendees included the dental board, AHCCCS, the Arizona Dental Association and Dr. Ralph Green. The minutes of that meeting said Dr. Green was representing “one of the mobile dental units”. We know that to be ReachOut Healthcare America.
At the stakeholders meeting, held prior to the February dental board meeting, two amendments had been brought forth for HB 2233. The first added a verbal “informed consent”. This would mean the consent for treatment could be given over the phone as long as it was recorded and stored. It also provided two distinct levels of consent; level one authorizing preventative and diagnostic services and the other level for actual treatment.
The second amendment eliminated the two levels of consent in amendment #1 and provided for an audio recorded informed consent, which included a section that redefined the meaning of “informed consent” in Arizona.
At the February 2011 board meeting lobbyist Stuart Goodman said “not to forget the art of politics – taking the ideal and making sacrifices for what is achievable. He also stated, “Bills that add more legislation do work as long as there is consensus among the parties. If there is not consensus, the members start looking for excuses and public safety aspects tent to get lost in the shuffle.”
Goodman recommended a hybrid of the two amendments. He wanted the board to removed the word “permanently” that was included in the original bill that had to do with the “recorded and stored” language it contained. Goodman requested the board move quickly deciding on the language as he was feared the Mobile Dental Bill would be pulled, citing “mobile dentistry would go unregulated another year.” Mr. Kevin Earl, executive director of the Arizona Dental Association, was more concerned about whether a copy of the recording would get submitted to the board if a patients records were subpoenaed. Upon MOTION by Dr. Waite and second by Dr. Morrison, the board gave Stuart Goodman the authority to modify the wording but hold off on modifying the definition of informed consent. They also wanted to meet again with Goodman in another stakeholders meeting and see if they could come to some sort of agreement. 
At the Arizona House Committee on Health and Human Services meeting February 16, 2011, Ralph Green’s lobbyist Gregory Harris signed up in support of HB 2233 but did not speak.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/1R/comm_min/House/021611%20HHS.PDF
The governor signed the Bill into law April 16, 2011. There was no two tiered approach to consent for treatment included in the final legislation that went into effect January 1, 2012. (Full Text of HB 2233)  ReachOut and Ralph Green, DDS won that battle.
32-1299.25. Informed consent; information for patients
A.  The permit holder of a mobile dental facility or portable dental unit must obtain appropriate informed consent, in writing or by verbal communication, that is recorded by an electronic or digital device from the patient or the parent or guardian of the patient authorizing specific treatment before it is performed. The signed consent form or verbal communication shall be maintained as part of the patient's record as required in section 32-1264.
B.  If services are provided to a minor, the signed consent form or verbal communication must inform the parent or guardian that the treatment of the minor by the mobile dental facility or portable dental unit may affect future benefits the minor may receive under private insurance, the Arizona health care cost containment system or the children's health insurance program.
C.  At the conclusion of each patient's visit, the permit holder of a mobile dental facility or portable dental unit shall provide each patient with an information sheet that must contain:
1.  Pertinent contact information as required by this section.
2.  The name of the dentist or dental hygienist, or both, who provided services.
3.  A description of the treatment rendered, including billed service codes, fees associated with treatment and tooth numbers if appropriate.
4.  If necessary, referral information to another dentist as required by this article.
D.  If the patient or the minor patient's parent or guardian has provided written consent to an institutional facility to access the patient's dental health records, the permit holder shall provide the institution with a copy of the information sheet provided in subsection C.





Jump ahead to February 2013, one year after this law took effect. Doris Goodale (R-Kingman) has once again introduced mobile dental clinic legislation; HB 2426. This time Goodale wants the two tiered level on consent passed. Providers would be required to get a second written or verbal consent for anything further than an exam and cleaning.
As it stands, HB 2426 would read as follows:
32-1299.25. Informed consent; information for patients
A. The permit holder of a mobile dental facility or portable dental unit must obtain appropriate informed consent, in writing or by verbal communication, that is recorded by an electronic or digital device from the patient or the parent or guardian of the patient authorizing specific treatment AN EXAMINATION OR PREVENTATIVE TREATMENT. The signed consent form or verbal communication shall be maintained as part of the patient's record as required in section 32‑1264.
B. Before a patient receives an irreversible procedure specific to the patient, the permit holder of a mobile dental facility or a portable dental unit must obtain informed consent from the patient or the patient's parent or guardian in addition to the original written consent pursuant to subsection A of this section. This consent must be either in writing or by verbal communication that is recorded by an electronic or digital device with a date and time stamp.
C. The signed consent form or verbal communication pursuant to subsections A and B of this section must be maintained as part of the patient's record as required pursuant to section 32-1264.
B. D. If services are provided to a minor, the signed consent form or verbal communication must inform the parent or guardian that the treatment of the minor by the mobile dental facility or portable dental unit may affect future benefits the minor may receive under private insurance, the Arizona health care cost containment system or the children's health insurance program.
C. E. At the conclusion of each patient's visit, the permit holder of a mobile dental facility or portable dental unit shall provide each patient with an information sheet that must contain:
1. Pertinent contact information as required by this section article.
2. The name of the dentist or dental hygienist, or both, who provided services.
3. A description of the treatment rendered, including billed service codes, fees associated with treatment and tooth numbers if appropriate.
4. If necessary, referral information to another dentist as required by this article.
D. F. If the patient or the minor patient's parent or guardian has provided written consent to an institutional facility to access the patient's dental health records, the permit holder shall provide the institution with a copy of the information sheet provided in subsection C E of this section.









Currently the Arizona HB 2426 sits in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee awaiting action.


Before HB2233 took effect in January 2012 the statute read as follows:
32-1299.25. Informed consent; information for patients
A.  The permit holder of a mobile dental facility or portable dental unit must obtain an appropriate written informed consent from the patient or the parent or guardian of the patient authorizing specific treatment before it is performed.
B.  If services are provided to a minor, the signed consent form must inform the parent or guardian of the following:
1.  If the minor already has a dentist, the parent or guardian should continue to arrange care through that provider.
2.  The treatment of the minor by the mobile dental facility or portable dental unit may affect future benefits the minor may receive under private insurance, the Arizona health care cost containment system or the children's health insurance program.
C.  At the conclusion of each patient's visit, the permit holder of a mobile dental facility or portable dental unit shall provide each patient with an information sheet that must contain:
1.  Pertinent contact information as required by this section.
2.  The name of the dentist or dental hygienist, or both, who provided services.
3.  A description of the treatment rendered, including billed service codes, fees associated with treatment and tooth numbers if appropriate.
4.  If necessary, referral information to another dentist as required by this article.
D.  If the patient or the minor patient's parent or guardian has provided written consent to an institutional facility to access the patient's dental health records, the permit holder shall provide the institution with a copy of the information sheet provided in subsection C.