201 KAR 8:006 prohibits a dentist from usingPlus according to other rules, a dentist is Kentucky must actively participate, and something tells me the owners of these clinics don't actively participate in the practice of dentistry in Kentucky.
false, misleading, or deceptive advertising and also
establishes the rules for dentists to advertise as
specialists or as being especially qualified in any
area of dentistry.
All dental advertisements shall contain the name of
each licensed dentist providing services within that
practice.
Further, a dentist shall not use the name of a
dentist who does not have an ownership interest or
any association in the dental practice. A dentist
who purchases the dental practice of another
dentist shall not use the name of the seller for
more than one (1) year after the purchase of the
practice. Also, a dentist shall not use the name of
another dentist who formerly practiced as a
partner, after the termination of that partner’s
ownership interest in the dental practice.
Any licensed Kentucky dentist may submit their
proposed advertising to the Kentucky Board of
Dentistry for written approval prior to using the
advertising.
Kentucky Dental Association Stops Small Smiles from Patient Shopping
November 2007
Dr. Jim Allen, DMD moved to disapprove Dr. Tony Quiroa’srequest for Board approval for hygienists from Small Smiles of Louisville to conduct dental screening services at various elementary schools. Dr. Gaskill seconded the motion. All were in favor.
Kudo's to the Kentucky Dental Board but should Small Smiles even be in the state. If they weren't, there would be no need to stop them from sending out a hygienists to patient shop as they have been found to do in other states.
I realize this is was last fall however the Kentucky Dental Board has not issued another newsletter at this time. They meet in Spring and Fall of each year.
1 Must Read Comments:
Per the Ohio Dental Board actions agaist Chad Hoecker he is on probation for a year in Ohio and can't only accept children, since he is a general dentist. I am not sure what happened in the Oklahoma meeting because he wasn't in the minutes.
More importantly he comes from a long line of legal dodgers: His dad is a dentist who still has his license after exposing himself to a patient.
Case Detail http://www.odcr.com/detail.php?Case=036NCRF%208600258&County=036N
County:
Kay (Newkirk) - County Last Updated: 05/20/2008 09:00
Case:
CRF-86-00258
STATE OF OKLAHOMA vs. HOECKER, GLEN RAY
Date Filed:
08/19/1986
Amount Owed:
$0.00 (as of 05/20/2008 09:00)
Offense
INDECENT EXPOSURE (FEL)
Parties
Defendant
HOECKER, GLEN RAY
Case Entries
Date:
Case Entries
Amount
02/27/2002
NON-COMPUTER CASE: FOR ALL ENTRIES PRIOR TO THIS DATE
REFER TO THE DOCKET SHEET.
Total:
$0.00
Date:
Time:
Calendar Events:
09/22/1986
Date Action: ST GUILTY PLEA Completed : 09/22/1986 Code: X
Post a Comment