Thursday, December 14, 2017

Boston Dental Group, LLC vs Affordable Care, LLC

Boston Dental Group, LLC (see more info at the end) and Affordable Care, LLC (Affordable Dentures and Implants) seem to be in a heated lawsuit in Nevada’s Federal Court.  I’ve not looked at the initial Complaint, (case no. 2:15-cv-01636) but I have read (link below) BDG’s Reply in Support of Partial Summary Judgement.  Appears BDG sued (for what I’m not sure) then Affordable Care filed a counter-suit., that seems to sound a whole lot like a SLAPP suit (boy, I’ve been there…lol).  But at this point in the story, I’m not even sure who is cheating who, as the song goes.

Link to Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Partial Summary Judgement (24 pages) filed August 25, 2017 in United States District Court, District of Nevada.

Anywho…I’ve pulled out some interesting items in this pleading and posted below.  More interesting, much of the this pleading is redacted and all the exhibits are filed “Under Seal”.

Enjoy!

Page 3, Line 3

“The question of the legality of Affordable Care’s management agreements with dentists
goes straight to the heart of whether Affordable Care has enforceable trademark rights. All of
Affordable Care’s claimed rights in its “dental services” trademarks are purportedly through
“oral licenses” it has with independent dental offices around the country. If the financial
arrangements with those dental offices are illegal, this illegal activity cannot form the basis of
any trademark rights, and Affordable Care’s has trademarks are unenforceable.”

Page 3, Line 12

The illegality of Affordable Care’s management agreement was an issue throughout this case and multiple discovery requests by BDG sought information concerning this illegal arrangement.
Despite the numerous discovery requests, Affordable Care refused to identify any
witnesses or produce any financial documents on this issue. Regardless, Defendant did produce
its 2007 Management Services Agreement which is illegal on its face (prior to this case being
filed Affordable Care produced an unsigned copy of this document which began the
conversation on the illegal nature of its arrangement with its dentists).
Now for the first time, Affordable Care decides to bring forth a witnesses and a handful
of select documents to claim that the 2007 illegal management agreement was just a copy-andpaste template and the fact that both it and the Nevada dental office signed the agreement was meaningless. Such a claim is simply unbelievable.

Page 4, Line 12

“Moreover, the specific allegations that Affordable Care’s trademark is unenforceable and
that it has unclean hands due to a violation of Nevada law has been in issue throughout this case,
including in the pleadings and throughout discovery.


In BDG’s Answer to Defendant’s Counterclaim, BDG states the following affirmative
defenses, among others:


Defendant’s counterclaims are barred by unclean hands.
Defendant’s trademarks are invalid and/or unenforceable.
       See BDG’s Answer to Counterclaim, Doc. 10, p. 5, lines 24-25. (Filed under Seal)


In addition to the pleadings, both before and after this lawsuit was filed, counsel for
BDG repeatedly informed Affordable Care that its management agreement with its Nevada
dentist was illegal under Nevada law.
This is apparently what prompted Affordable Care to
amend its management agreement with its Nevada dentist and back-date it to January 1, 2016
.”

Page 5, Line 15

“Affordable Care’s actions constitute the illegal practice of dentistry in Nevada and cannot form
the basis of any claimed trademark rights for dental services.”

Page 5, Line 19

“As set out in more detail in BDG’s Motion to Strike, Affordable Care failed to name Mr.
Steelman
as witnesses and failed to produce the financial information it now claims address
BDG’s arguments concerning trademark priority and the unenforceability of Defendant’s
trademarks. This declaration and these documents should be stricken and not considered by this
court.”


Page 5, Line 24

“Not only was this witness not identified during discovery and these documents not
produced, BDG requested this information and Defendant Affordable Care refused to produce
it. Specifically, BDG requested an identification of all witnesses and documents related to
financial information of the Las Vegas affiliated practice, including:

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 9:
Please produce documents sufficient to show for Nevada and California
Affordable Care’s and any Nevada or California Licensee’s monthly and annual
net profit from goods for services sold under Affordable Care Marks from 2007 to
the present.


RESPONSE: In addition to the foregoing General Objections, Affordable
Care objects to this request as irrelevant to this action and not reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Neither Plaintiff’s
action for declaratory relief of non-infringement nor Affordable Care’s
counterclaims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair
competition involves evidence of profit from goods or services sold under
Affordable Care Marks. See Doc. 32-7 as Exhibit 7, p. 3. (Filed under Seal)


INTERROGATORY NO. 11:
Please state in detail the factual basis, including, but not limited to,
identification of all documents and persons, all sums and amounts received by
you from your affiliated practices located in California and Nevada.


ANSWER: In addition to the foregoing General Objections, Affordable
Care objects to this Interrogatory because the revenue that Affordable Care has
received from its affiliated practices in Nevada and California is not relevant to
Plaintiff’s claims and defenses, or Affordable Care’s counterclaims, which all
relate to the use of the AFFORDABLE DENTURES Marks
. Affordable Care
further objects to this Interrogatory because the information sought in this
Interrogatory is not proportional to the needs of the case.

INTERROGATORY NO. 13:
Please state in detail the factual basis, including, but not limited to,
identification of all documents and persons, of all reimbursements, including, but
not limited to, fee-for-service methods of reimbursements paid to you and/or paid
by you to your affiliated dental practices located in California and Nevada.


ANSWER: In addition to the foregoing General Objections, Affordable
Care objects to this Interrogatory because Affordable Care’s financial relationship
with its affiliated practices in Nevada and California is not relevant to Plaintiff’s
claims and defenses, or Affordable Care’s counterclaims, which all relate to the
use of the AFFORDABLE DENTURES Marks. Affordable Care further objects
to this Interrogatory because the information sought in this Interrogatory is not
proportional to the needs of the case. See Doc. 32-5 as Exhibit 2, p. 9-10. (Filed under Seal)


Affordable Care cannot refuse to produce this information or identify witnesses during
discovery and then attempt to get into evidence a new witness and select documents because it
now suits them.”

Page 7, Line 17

“C. Defendant’s Arrangement with its Nevada Dentist is Illegal Under Nevada
Law

1. The Evidence of Record in this Case Demonstrates that Affordable Care
Operated Illegally in Nevada.

Page 9, Line 9

“In addition to the fact that Affordable Care’s surprise declaration and exhibits were
never produced and should not be considered, this untimely evidence contradicts the evidence
that is properly of record in this case, including the sworn testimony of Affordable Care’s only
witness,
Adam Siegal who testified (redacted) See Exhibit 5, Adam Siegal Deposition, p. 28 lines 17-24”

This was echoed by Dr. Cher Y. Chang who owns the Nevada dental practice. She
testified as follows: (redacted) See Exhibit 6, Cher Y. Chang, DMD Deposition, p. 12, line 16 - p. 13, line 19. (Filed under Seal)

As set out in detail in BDG’s Motion, this is a clear violation of Nevada law. See NRS
631.395 (“A person is guilty of the illegal practice of dentistry or dental hygiene who . . . 10.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 631.385, owns or controls a dental practice, shares in the
fees received by a dentist or controls or attempts to control the services offered by a dentist if
the person is not himself or herself licensed pursuant to this chapter.”) emphasis added; See also
NRS 631.215(2)(h)(1) (stating that a person who provides goods or services to a dental practice
may not, “[p]rovide such goods or services in exchange for payments based on a percentage or
share of revenues or profits of the dental practice, office or clinic.”)”

Page 9, Line 24

“Even if this Court were to consider the declaration of Mr. Steelman and the undisclosed
Vegas Financial Statements and Vegas Fee Statements, the arrangement between Affordable
Care and its Nevada dental office appears to be illegal under Nevada law.”

Page 9, Line 28

“This is abundantly clear from the Vegas Financial Statements and the Vegas Fee Statements. (redacted) (See 2016 Management Services Contract, Doc. 54-1 as Exhibit A-4, p. 21 AFCA 0009190). (Filed under Seal)

Page 11, Line 6

“Mr. Steelman’s claim that the amounts paid by the Nevada dental practice are
contractually “fixed” simply does not hold up to scrutiny.

”Page 11, Line 15

“Affordable Care’s sham “fixed” fee simply does not stand up to scrutiny and is illegal under Nevada law.

Moreover, Affordable Care has not identified a single state where this type of arrangement
would be legal.
Affordable Care’s business practices appear to violate the laws of every, or
nearly every, state it operates in
.”

”Page 11, Line 20

“Illegal Activity Cannot Form the Basis of Any Trademark Rights
Affordable Care’s arrangement with the Nevada dental office is illegal under Nevada
law and cannot form the basis of any trademark rights. CreAgri, Inc. v. USANA Health Scis.,
Inc., 474 F.3d 626, 630 (9th Cir. 2007).” (Filed under Seal)

“In this case, BDG, a company owned by a licensed Nevada dentist, is merely seeking a
declaratory judgment that Affordable Care’s trademarks for dental services are invalid and
should be cancelled. Affordable Care (not BDG) filed a counterclaim for trademark
infringement. Thus, while Affordable Care’s priority date in this case is when it first obtained
enforceable trademark rights in order to bring its counterclaim, the relevant priority date for
BDG is when it first began using its allegedly infringing mark, namely when it opened its first
dental office in January 2008.”

“As detailed above, Affordable Care’s illegal practice of dentistry in Nevada was not
lawful commercial use and cannot form the basis of any trademark rights which pre-date BDG’s
use of its Affordable Dental mark. Plaintiff Boston Dental Group’s trademark rights in its
Affordable Dental mark, which began at least as early as January 2008, therefore have priority
over Affordable Care’s illegal activity.s



Adam Siegal-VP-Mrktg-Affordable Care


S. Paul Steelman, Jr-Affordable Care CPA-VP

Boston Dental Group, LLC

Registered Agent and Managing Member:

David Tawei Ting, DMD
6960 Westcliff Dr., Ste 200
Las Vegas,NV  89145

Ting has as least 36 companies where he is the registered agent according to a search of the Nevada Secretary of State’s website.

Some of the more interesting ones are:

Affordable Dental At Laughlin, LLC
Affordable Dental at Westcliff, LLC
BDG Coaching, LLC (what exactly is being coached?)
Boston Dental Group at Anthem, LLC
Boston Dental Management, LLC
C and T Dental Laboratory, LLC
Cambridge Dental Consulting Group
Cambridge Dental Technology, Inc
Dapha Dental Technology, Inc.
Dentisting, LLC (huh?)
Friendly Ting, PC
Haider, Ting and Chung, LLC
Handpiece Club, LLC
Looting, LLC (WHAT!  I could run with this like Forrest Gump)
Vita Smile, LLC

Thursday, December 07, 2017

Patients, think your dentist has any influence as to how your “Affordable Dentures” are made? Think again.

Patients, think your dentist has any influence as to how your Affordable Care dentures are made, since they are made “in-house’?  Think again.


Email clip

Saturday, December 02, 2017

Affordable Care Sends Goon Squad to Evict Dentist in Louisiana. WHAT?

In a lawsuit filed on November 27, 2017 in Louisiana Federal Court, Affordable Care (Affordable Dentures) is accused of:

Illegal Eviction
Intentional Effliction of Emotion
Interruption of business
Defamation
Breach of Contract
Unfair Competition
Tortious Interference with Contract between Doctor and Patient
Illegal Practice of Dentistry

Excerpts from the Complaint (Civil Action 17-13015) :

Affordable Care goon squad

Agents?  Whoa!! Sounds more like a goon squad to me, but what do I know?

Goon Squad changed locks

Full text of Complaint below:


Doc 1 Complaint-Coleman v Affordable Care 171127 by Dentist The Menace on Scribd

Link to revealing Contracts and Agreements in regards to Affordable Care and Exhibits in Louisiana lawsuit.

Doc 1-1 – Purchase Agreement Exhibit

Doc 1-2 – Lease Agreement Exhibit

Doc 1-3 – License Agreement Exhibit

Doc 1-4 – Affordable Care Management Service Agreement

Doc 1-5 – Revenue From Patient Financing Chart



Why is Mark Birner of BDMS/Perfect Teeth, a DSO in Colorado, leading his name and dental licenses to Affordable Care, a DSO in North Carolina?

On May 30, 2017, an entity was registered in New Jersey called, Dr. Birner, PA.  The Manager being Mark Birner.

The “Incorporator” was Sonia Surasky, a paralegal for Affordable Care dba Affordable Dentures and Implants, headquartered in Raleigh, North Caronlina.

The mailing address for Dr. Birner, PA is 156 West State Street, Trenton, NJ, home of State Street Partners, a lobbying firm!

Dr. Birner, PA


In a legal case recently filed in New Jersery against Affordable Care (which I will get into later),

Affordable Care -Dr. Birner PC





Affordable Care says it assigned its lease to certain clinics in New Jersey to Dr. Birner, PA.on June 5, 2017.

Excerpts from Exhibit B:

image






What’s this? A Management Agreement between Dr. Birner, PA and Affordable Care?

image



image

Sounds to me that Dr. Birner, PA has complete control of the Premises yet Affordable Care is still the landlord of the dental practice. Huh? I think this is not just double speak, it’s triple speak.

image







WHAT? But the dentist has spent nearly $200,000.00 to purchase the equipment, furnshings, and other assets”.


image










Ah Ha!  Mark Birner, owner of Birner Dental Managements (a DSO) operating as Perfect Teeth, is lending his name and dental license to be the “designated dentist” who supposedly leases the premises where yet another dentist operates an Affordable Dentures clinic.

Just my opinion of course but looks to me like the Association of Dental Management Organization is more like a cartel. 

image

image

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Patients Wonder Why Dental Boards Do Nothing About Bad Dentistry: Here’s why

Below is a list of a few dental boards who have Board Member who work for private equity/corporate owned dental chains.  Keep in mind in most states this is illegal. So what does that make these board members? Just saying…

Last updated: 12-7-2017 6:38PM

Arkansas

Dr. Richard Smith - Monarch Dental

Colorado

Mark William Adams, DDS – ClearChoice Dental Implant Centers

Dr. Vidhyalakshmi Sampath – Bright Now! Dental DSO

Florida

Joseph V. Calderone, Jr.,  DMD – Heartland Dental d/b/a DeBary Dental Care (to find search Heartland for dentist near zip code 32713)

Georgia

Dale Mayfield, DMD - Kool Smiles
Gregg Goggans - Smile Doctors (Dental Board Vice President)

Illinois

Julie Galloway, DDS – Heartland Dental

Indiana

Jeffery Snoddy,DDS – Heartland Dental

Iowa

Monica Foley, DDS  – Heartland Dental

William McBride, DDS – Midwest Dental

Maryland

Robert R. Windsor, DDS – Dental Care Alliance (Unconfirmed)

Michigan

Gregory Heintschel, DDS – President and CEO of My Community Dental Centers

Minnesota

Douglas Wolfe, DDS – Kool Smiles (Unconfirmed)

Nevada

Ali Shahrestani, DMD– Pacific Dental Service

New Jersey

Steve Goldstein , DDS– Dental Care Alliance

George McMurray, DDS – Allied Dental

Daneil DiCesare, DMD – Allied Dental

Pennsylvania

Andrew Matta, DMD – Chief Medical Officer and Founding Partner of North American Dental Group

Texas

Kimberly Haynes-Reese, DDS – Aspen Dental

H. Jorge Quirch, DDS – Heartland Dental

Virginia

Jamiah K. Dawson, DDS – Affordable Dentures and Implants

Washington

Lyle McClellan, DDS – Director of Doctor Development at Williamette Dental Group

Aaron Stevens, DMD – Williamette Dental Group


Check your state boards members.  If you find a member affilliated with a DSO, please email me and I will keep the list updated.

Related:

Big Step Forward: Dental Board Gives Voice to Group Dental Practices at State Level

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Gov. Abbott Appoints Aspen Dental Dentist to to Texas State Board of Dental Examiners

Agency Capture at it’s finest!
171121-Kimberly Haynes bio-tsbde(2)






http://www.kbtx.com/content/news/Local-dentist-named-to-State-Board-of-Dental-Examiners-458947533.html

Checking her dental licenses at the board and it’s sparkling clean.

However:

June 3.2016-Kimberly Haynes, DMD, received non-discipline remedial plan because of a complaint from a patient.  She was found to have fallen below the minimum standard of care, failed to keep adequate records and no informed consent from the patient among other things.

I'm told, David Tillman, the presiding officer is a weak leader and appointed for that very reason. I'm told board member Bryan Henderson, DDS is pro-DSO.  Kimberly Haynes, DMD, as we see is an Aspen dentist and H. Jorge Quirch, D.D.S is a Heartland dentist. One more and the DSO's will have a majority. Not that it matters because I'm also told the hygienists back the DSO's as well.



Thursday, September 21, 2017

Texas State Board of Dental Examiners is a RAGING DUMPSTER FIRE!

Here is an article you may have interest in posting on DTM.   All of this information is in good faith and written for the purpose to expose the mismanagement at the Texas State Dental Board. 

----------------------------

It has been six months since an investigative reporter has exposed Kelly Parker's mismanagement and unethical behavior as the executive director at the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners.  Since then, the Board Members have done NOTHING.  She has brought disgrace onto the Board and dental profession as evidenced by negative media reports and multiple employee complaints.

Several employees brought their concerns directly to Board members only to hit a wall.  Employees jeopardized their own jobs by contacting Board members to report what was happening with the executive director they appointed.  Dr. Steve Austin, DDS, the presiding officer of the Board, refused to even listen because he feared being involved in any type of subsequent employee hearing.  See email below.

upmost

Kelly Parker shut down criminal investigations which allowed dentists and other licensees to potentially get away with criminal activity.  State Senators Jose Menendez and Charles Schwertner, as well as the Governor's office, were alerted to this fact.  Hello?!  Where are these officials??  Where are the Texas Rangers?  Or the Attorney General's Office?? 

At least nine former criminal investigators can testify in this matter.  NONE of them have yet been contacted by anyone, not even the senators or governor's office even though they said they would "look in to it."  Many of these investigators still have copies of their investigative reports that were written.  These ex-investigators are just waiting to share their stories with the appropriate authorities.

All but THREE criminal investigators left the Texas Dental Board this year because of Kelly Parker.  There are NO criminal investigators left in the entire Dallas region, the San Antonio region, or the entire Houston region!  None of them have been replaced.  After the entire investigative supervisory staff left this year, she promoted one sergeant to lieutenant who resigned his position after just a few weeks of having to deal with Kelly Parker.  He quit the agency shortly thereafter as well.  The mismanagement and unethical decisions coming from Parker prompted many people to leave without having another job to go to.  Once again, NONE of the Board Members want to address the nightmare they created.

It is estimated that over HALF the agency employees have left since Kelly Parker and Nycia Deal started running the agency into the ground.  Due to the large number of vacancies that have been caused by Kelly Parker, the agency HAS to be behind hundreds and hundreds (if not over a thousand) of complaints waiting to be investigated.  She has no one to investigate these complaints!  They are apparently trying to use various staff to clear out complaints.  NO ONSITES are being conducted at dental clinics, NO SANITATION/STERILIZATION inspections are being conducted, so how can they be claiming they're protecting the public??? 

Kelly Parker and Nycia Deal shut down onsite inspections and the ability to allow investigators to issue sanitation citations to violators.  That has been stopped for well over a year.  What is the purpose of that?  Makes as much sense as stopping criminal investigations!  With all the changes being made, one could easily argue that they are in the business of protecting DENTISTS, NOT THE PUBLIC!!

An independent outside audit should take place.  Chances are extremely high that numbers about backlogged cases are being hidden.  The same goes for the severely backlogged cases that are being bungled by Dr. Brook Bell and her dental division.

Kelly Parker has lost her second executive administrative assistant.  This is the second one in a row to just quit.  She lost her communications director, too.  Kelly Parker reportedly received a large number of negative feedback from a department-wide survey that was sent about her.  This should be very telling that all of these new employees already have nothing but negative to report about her and her management style.

In the two years that Kelly Parker and Nycia Deal have so poorly mismanaged the TSBDE, are they any better off than where they were two years ago?  ABSOLUTELY NOT.  In fact, they're probably in such a state of disarray, it will be a MONUMENTAL task for a new executive director to come in and right this sinking ship.

The real shame is that none of the Board Members care enough about their profession, much less the public, to deal with the problem they created by putting Kelly Parker and Nycia Deal in charge to make blunder after blunder.  Hundreds, if not more than a thousand dental complaints are not being tended to.  Hundreds, if not more than a thousand complaints are waiting to be reviewed.  The entire state of Texas only has three experienced investigators left.  People have been leaving the agency in droves.  They cannot retain staff.  Morale is abysmal. 

The TSBDE is now a raging dumpster fire and the Board Members seemingly ignore these facts.

                                                                                                                                                                     ---Anonymous


Thursday, August 24, 2017

September 2017 Conference: Top Trends in Dentistry Not Heard Anywhere Else

Concerned Dentists of Texas Presents: Business of Dentistry 101

image

When: Friday, September 15, 2017 (9am-5pm) during the Southwest Dental Conference
Where: Dallas Omni Hotel Cedars Room, 555 S Lamar St, Dallas, TX 75202
Registration: Concerned Dentists of Texas (CDOT)
Contact person: Jackie Stanfield, DDS, concderneddentistsoftexas@gmail.com 
                            (972) 355-2273


Topics include:

  • Problems facing dentists, new or retiring, involving dental practices owned and operated by Private Equity companies and Wall Street Hedge Funds.
  • Understanding dental employment contracts: the vulnerabilities and consequences.
  • Discussion about the business model of dentistry such as Dental Service Organizations (DSO’s): the impact on dentists, staff and patients.
  • Legal issues and potential ramification facing dentists today.
  • Medicaid Fraud
  • Government and Legislation issues: overreach and/or underreach.
  • Solutions: what you can do to protect your patients, yourself, your business and financial future.


Rare appearance together by following speakers:

CDOT-Flyer-draft-1
































Lunch will be provided by the following meeting sponsors: 
Dr. Rene Scott
Frank Brown, ADS Watson Brown and Associates
Johnette Green, Wells Fargo, johnette.green@wellsfargo.com
Dr. Shab Krish, MJ and Sleep Therapy Center of North Texas; and
Josh Knowles, Allstate


Concerned Dentists of Texas (CDOT) is committed to the well-being of the dental profession and the patients we serve.

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

Bethaniel Jefferson indicted on a felony charge of causing serious bodily injury to a child by omission

Dentist Craig Jacobs, Nevaeh Hall's mother Courissa and family members look on as attorney Jim Moriarty shows a  graph depicting  the EKG and oxygen levels during the 4-year-old's dental appointment. Photo: Craig Hartley Craig Hartley, Freelance / Copyright: Craig H. Hartley

Photo: Craig Hartley Craig Hartley, Freelance

Excerpts from Houston Chronicle Story:

A former Houston dentist was formally charged Monday (July 24, 2017) with failing to properly treat a sedated 4-year-old patient who was left with permanent brain damage in what should have been a routine procedure.


The child's mother, Courissa Clark, said she was "overjoyed" when she heard the news.


"We're really grateful that justice has been served and the person that did this to our baby is finally being brought to justice," Hall told the Chronicle.


"When little Nevaeh was taken to the dentist that day, (her parents) turned her over to the dentist trusting that the dentist would protect and look after their little girl," said attorney James Moriarty. "But she overdosed her on sedatives."


The girl was sedated at the Diamond Dental office about 8:30 a.m. Jan. 7, 2016, prosecutors said in a statement. Three hours later she suffered a seizure, and her oxygen level and temperature fell dramatically. Prosecutors say it took more than four hours before anyone called for medical assistance.


Jefferson was reprimanded by the Texas Board of Dental Examiners in 2005 and 2012, prosecutors said. The board revoked her license in November after a state administrative judge ruled that she "fell below the minimum standard of care, failed to uphold the duty of fair dealing and committed dishonorable conduct when providing dental care."


The Chronicle's investigation cast a spotlight on Medicaid dental clinics that had flourished through treatment of pediatric patients whose low-income families qualified for government assistance.


Medicaid dental claims in Texas quintupled between 2005 and 2015 to $1 billion a year after the state doubled reimbursement rates in 2007.


Jefferson now faces trial on a first-degree felony charge.


"This indictment should send a message to the medical community that they will be held accountable for abandoning their patients in times of crisis," prosecutor Stan Clark of the Texas attorney general's Medicare fraud unit said in the statement.


"While accidents in the health care industry occur more than everyone would prefer, practitioners must react appropriately and contact higher level medical care providers when they realize their patient is distressed beyond their capabilities," he said.

Read the Entire Article Here

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

3-year-old Daleyza Avila-Hernandez’s Death at Children’s Dental Surgery Center and a Louisana Psychologist.

clip_image001

On Monday, June 12, 2017 3-year-old Daleyza Avila-Hernandez died at Saint Joseph’s Hospital after what was a simple procedure at Children’s Dental Surgery Center, in Stockton, California.

According to Fox40 News, Daleyza was referred to Children’s Dental Surgery Center by a dentist at Western Dental.

“I don’t want this to happen to another mother like it’s happening to me,” said Araceli Avila, Daleyza's mother.

“All I did was I took my daughter to the dentist because they were going to fix her teeth, and about 30 minutes later they brought her back dead,” Avila said.

The mother says she was not allowed to go back with her child during the procedure but while waiting for her daughter she saw an ambulance arrive.

“And I stood up and went outside because I was like 'they are coming for a kid,' but I never thought it was for my child," she said.

Within moment a nurse appeared and told the mother something went wrong and her daugther’s heart stopped, and that “maybe she had underlying heart issues”.

The mother disputes that saying her child “was a very healthy”. Avila and her husband, Jose Hernandez, recalled seeing the toddler "vivacious and full of life" just before the procedure.

According to FOX40 website:

“FOX40 spoke to David Thompson, the administrator of Children's Dental Surgery Center in Stockton, who says they only do general dental procedures -- such as filling cavities and putting on crowns.

Her parents say Daleyza went in to have two teeth pulled and have caps put on two other teeth.

Thompson says the girl had a reaction to the anesthetics, was stabilized and then sent to Saint Joseph's Hospital. They don't know why she died.

"It’s a terrible, terrible tragedy honestly and our thoughts and prayers are really with the family right now," Thompson said. Thompson said staff members at the center were well trained and have years of experience.

"We’re committed to helping kids every single day. That’s our mission, that’s why we’re here. It’s risky. Not everyone wants to do it," he told Fox 40.

The Dental Board of California released the following statement:

"The Dental Board of California is aware of the tragic situation. An investigation is underway so specific details of the case cannot be shared at this time.  Consumer protection is the board’s highest concern and we want to extend our deepest sympathy to the family."

The Stockton Police Department is also investigating. Spokesman Joseph Silva says at this time the case isn't suspicious or considered criminal, but it is still an active investigation.

According to ABC10 Children’s Dental Surgery Center is a non-profit ambulatory surgery center located in the 1500 block of East March Lane in Stockton.

Really? Non-Profit? Hmmm…

Staff according to Children’s Dental Surgery Center website:

image

According to his LinkedIn page Perry Solomon, MD is an Anesthesiology and Cheif Medical Officer at HelloMD, described as:

“HelloMD is the leading digital healthcare platform for the cannabis industry. Patients use our service to connect with a doctor, get a medical cannabis recommendation over live video (Telehealth), and gain seamless entry to thousands of cannabis products, dispensaries and advice on medicinal efficacy.
We are the largest reliable source for cannabis information about medical conditions and products, have our unique platform called Answers where questions are posted from all over the world and are answered by our physicians, product manufacturers and other patients, building a community of like minded people.”


Solomon’s LinkedIn page also says he is:

  • Medical Director at Children’s Dental Surgery and Central California Dental Surgicenter.
  • Medical Director for Cardiac Rehabilitation for Tenent Healthcare
  • Owner of Bridges Mecical Clinic

Sung “Caleb” Cho, DDS operates Ygnacio Dental in Walnut Creek, CA.

Looking at Children’s Dental Surgery Center website, for reasons unknown the title of the page linked to the Patient Information Packet is Sierra Kings Dental Surgery. Huh?

clip_image003


clip_image005


Since search the business entity names at the California Secretary of state site revealed zero results for the company names, a little more research finds Central California Dental Surgery Center is actually US Dental Surgery Center, Inc. incorporated in March 2008 by Philip Goldberg.


image


March 2015 annual report at the California Secretary of State’s website shows US Dental Surgery Center is owned and operated solely by Carol E. Freeman, 429 Chateau Grimaldi, Mandeville, Louisiana 7047. Carol E. Freeman appears to be a licensed Psychologist in Louisiana doing business as CAROL E. FREEMAN, PHD, LLC


clip_image006

clip_image007

The January 1, 2017 annual report for US Dental Surgery, Inc shows no change and Carol E. Freeman still listed as “owner”.

clip_image009


So what in the hell is a psychologist, from Louisiana doing operating dental surgery centers in California?

And exactly what is this “referral partnership” between her and Smiles Depot, Northern Valley Indian Health, Western Dental, Charter House, Shasta Community Health Center, Fremont Dental, Access Dental and ProDental, as shown on Children’s Dental Surgery Center website?

clip_image011


clip_image013

Friday, April 28, 2017

Texas State Board of Dental Examiners Loss of Investigators and Staff, is Michael Melanson’s Gain

 

Debbie-color-sm (6) 12-31-2016By: Debbie Hagan

 

Reports abound this week about the Texas State Board of Dental Examiner’s finding insufficient  of wrong doing by Dr. Michael Melanson as it related to the death of Daisy Lynn Torres:

AUSTIN (KXAN) — The dentist who was treating a 14-month-old girl for cavities when she died after going under anesthesia has been cleared of any wrongdoing by the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners.

Dr. Michael Melanson was working on Daisy Lynn Torres’ teeth at the Austin Children’s Dentist in northwest Austin on March 29, 2016 when she suffered complications and died. The child’s autopsy report ruled that anesthesia caused her death.

There was an anesthesiologist on-site during Daisy Lynn’s appointment, according to a 911 recording and a spokesperson from Austin Children’s Dentistry. However, what as at issue in a lawsuit is a portion of the autopsy including a report from a forensic dental examiner, Dr. Robert Williams. The report questioned why the child was having a dental procedure before she died. The report prompted Austin Children’s Dentistry to suspend Dr. Melanson, who no longer works at the practice, last July.

At the time, the dental office said he would remain suspended until the State Board finished its investigation.

Read entire story here.

I think the keyphrase here is “finshed its investigation”. 

Melanson’s attorney Mike Yanof said, “The dental board has closed its investigation and they found insufficient evidence to support proceeding further in the matter.”

Could that be because there are no investigators left to investigate? The last Lieutenant Investigator, Travis Mott, took a demotion back to Sergent and Kelly Parker has “decided to make investigators file clerk, arranging fild folders for the Dental Review Panel, according to once source.

One reader wrote:

I am seething upon hearing this, as there was testimony in the autopsy report by forensic dentist Dr. Robert Williams that no dental disease was present upon autopsy of Daisy Lynn Torres. The child need not have been administered general anesthesia or subconscious sedation to the level to create death.  While the dentist may not have caused the death, the circumstances that precipitated the death surely involved the dentist's and clinic's actions to cause a surgical procedure to be done. If the TSBDE foing "no evidence," what about the misdiagnosis of dental disease in the name of bilking Medicaid?

The civil lawsuit will, no doubt, march ahead.  However, given the past evidence of this dentist's shaky affiliations and representations of skills, competency, fraudulence, and ill-will, the TSBDE just didn't look. Just as they glazed over my claim...they are toothless.

I agree.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Texas State Board of Dental Examiners: Decaying Rapidly Under Direction of Executive Director Kelly Parker

Debbie-color-sm (6) 12-31-2016By: Debbie Hagan


DTM has learned that in recent weeks the following people have submitted letters of resignation or already ended their employment with the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners(TSBDE):

  1. David Durkop, Lieutenant Investigator for Texas Dental Board;
  2. Greg Gilchrist, Lieutenant Investigator for Texas State Board of Dental Examiners;
  3. Donnie Head, Assistant Director of Investigations at Texas State Board of Dental Examiners Jones, Director of Investigations;
  4. Lisa Jones, Director of Investigations, and;
  5. Jeff Roach, Lieutenant Investigator for Texas Dental Board

Additionally, other than the Legal Division, every department head has walked out and quit without notice, including the Licensing Department head.

So what happened to the already troubled TSBDE?

Ms. Kelly Parker is what happened.

The TSBDE hired Ms. Parker as the new Executive Director in September 2015. Then they gave her Cate Blanche to run the board as she saw fit and things changed drastically.

Prior to Kelly Parker’s hiring the standing Orders from Director of Investigation Lisa Jones to the board investigators were to share anything they had with other law enforcement agencies.

Parker quickly changed that and demanded that she give her stamp of approval the sharing of any and all information with other agencies—law enforcement or otherwise.  If agencies called investigators requesting information, they were to be directed to the Legal Division, pronto.

Parker is not focused on public safety, not justice, not oversight nor fair resolution. Parker's focus is on "Days to Case Resolution”, nothing else.

“Days to Case Resolution” is how the Board is rated by the Legislature as well as internally by the Board for the Investigative Division. The speed of the case is much more important than the quality of the case. Criminal cases take more time and manpower than Administrative cases, resulting in few, if any, criminal cases being worked.

Additionally, despite it being a violation of Texas law, the Legal Division decided that the DSOs could own, operate or maintain a dental office as long as the DSO did not direct clinical care. We all know that never happens, right?

Gosh, wish I could just decide to change the speed limit law to suit me on any given day.

Throwing another turd in the proverbial punchbowl, was Parker’s insistence that a new database go “live” on September 1, 2016, the beginning of the fiscal year, ready or not.

It was not!

There are two databases: Versa(VR) and Paper Vision(PVE) that are supposed to “talk” to each other, so to speak, and work with the Health Care Professional Council, which consists of 5 agencies; the board of dentistry being one of them.

There are no Standard Operating Procedures in place and the databases being incompatible with each other which means all data has to be entered twice; once into VR and again into PVE.

PVE was so not ready investigators learned for months all the data entered and reports marked “approved” that was to send the matter on to the next “work step” it went to a virtual “dead letter box”.

Why?

Because the next “work step” had not even been created yet! That’s right, folks, it went nowhere and to no one!

Talk about waste of time, money and resources!

With the recent departure of supervisors, the Board has lost close to 40 years of dental investigative experience and over 100 years of law enforcement experience. This is not a common investigative skill set and can take several years to develop.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

Texas State Board of Dental Examiners Refers Investigation to Local Police Departments. Should People Just Call 911 Bypassing the Board Completely?

Debbie-color-sm (6) 12-31-2016By: Debbie Hagan

Last week, News 4 in San Antonio, Texas ran a story about how the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners farms out it’s duties to the local police station instead of investigating themselves. Thanks to a tipster, who says the dental board isn’t the least bit interested in making any changes, I’m publishing the story here, not to critique the story but to comment on the luncy of the content.

Dental board refers out criminal investigations

by APRIL MOLINA

March 14, 2017

“The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners receives dozens of complaints each year; among them, drug diversion and addiction, practicing dentistry without a license and dentists performing unnecessary work.”

Uh, I would say it’s more like hundreds of complaints; maybe even thousands.

"It is I think appropriate that the dental board evaluate all complaints and if they find wrongdoing, either civil or criminal, then it's incumbent upon our dental agency, our dental board to take action," said Texas State Senator Charles Schwertner.”

The citizens of Texas think the board should as well, but over the last several years, I think they have seen the dental board take less and less action. In fact I would say the TSBDE is the least effective of all dental boards, well maybe other than California.

“The dental board has always investigated the administrative side of complaints and for more than a decade board investigators have also had the ability to conduct criminal investigations, often handing cases over to the local district attorneys for prosecution.”

"In hopes of protecting my community and protecting the citizens of Texas I passed this bill that gave them the capacity to have licensed peace officers," said State Senator Jose Menendez.

Menendez's 2003 law enabled the dental board to hire experienced dental investigators with the authority to investigate criminal cases without delay.”

Apparently the TSBDE were not doing their job in 2003 either! Over 14 very long years later, the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners have had the full force for the law behind them to investigate criminal acts of dentists? WOW! Who knew, right? I bet Lisa Jones, the Director of Investigations, should, could and would put the handcuffs on the criminals.

“In late 2016, a whistleblower tipped off the News 4 Trouble Shooters that a decision was made to re-direct criminal investigations at the end of 2015.”

“Re-direct” to where? To be “re-directed” they have to have once been “directed” to someone or someplace, right?

“3 months after Executive Director, Kelly Parker, took over, the director of investigations sent out this email to staff: "Per Kelly, as of today, we will no longer investigate the criminal aspects of a complaint. We will not be filing cases directly with the D.A. any longer. If you have a case with a criminal element, work the administrative side of it and refer the criminal elements to a local police department with jurisdiction."

Say what!! 3 months in and she took this approach? Who hired this Kelly Parker, anyway? And who is she to decide? Clearly, the ED has way too much power. Who’s directing the Director?

At a hearing of the Committee on Public Health in 2012 Lisa Jones, Director of Enforcement for the TSBDE stated she had been with the board for 10 years and Director of Enforcement for over 7. At the hearing Jones stated there had been 153 case of fraud reported and only 5 dentists in 5 years had their licenses revoked or voluntarily surrendered. When asked about cases turned over the local District Attorney’s Jones stated in the last 2 years they had turned over 200 cases and only 5 had some sort of conviction. Lisa Jones is still the Director of Investigations.

The Executive Director at the time was Glenn Parker, who couldn’t attend, but sent a letter. Committee Chair Lois Kolkhorst read from a letter sent in by Glenn Parker, where he made it clear local District Attorneys were reluctant to prosecute these cases, since murders and such took precedence. So, are you telling me, Executive Director of the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, Kelly Parker, thinks sending a file over to the local cop’s desk would get better results!

SERIOUSLY!!

Kelly, hon, you have a Director of Investigations, right there in your office. I bet you see her at least one or two times a week. She gets paid to “investigate”. Yet you believe you and your office staff are just too busy with ….uh…work….uh… so important that the local police station should do it! I can’t even get my head around that!

Where are you going to “re-direct” the investigations next, the local dog catcher’s desk?

“Parker would not agree to an interview, but sent us this statement: "Other agencies exist for the purpose of pursuing the criminal violation and it would be wasteful and redundant for the dental board to do so, too."

Well, Good God Almighty! Taxpayers wouldn’t want any ‘waste”! (sarcasm)

Ms. Parker, for years, those same agencies along with the state legislators—and the public— have been asking why your agency has done little to nothing to take care of dental related crimes and violations. Earn that $92,000 a year, darlin’! Now, there’s some “waste” for you to ponder.

Friday, March 17, 2017

Facts Reveal ALEC “Overregulation Threatens Market-Driven Solutions in Dentistry” Study is Pure Crap!

By: Debbie Hagan
The below story was posted on Group Dentistry Now; the propaganda machine for the Dental Support Organization(DSO) industry. I first called the whole story “horse shit” but I was wrong—when I’m wrong I’ll admit it. I now need to make that correction and rephrase; it is utter “bull shit”. And this ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), well, it’s the “horse shit”. (see ALEC Exposed) and has been under scrutiny for a very long time; some questioning if is even legal—google it. Of course this makes it a perfect match for the DSO industry, right?  ALEC chairman of the board is Mr. W. Preson Baldwin, from the lobbyist group Centerpoint360, which received $442k from the Association of Dental Support Organizations in 2015. (see page 8 of the ADSO tax return) Centerpoint360, received $268K in 2014. Now read the story with the hidden facts revealed. When you are finished ask yourself this: “If it’s so overregulated, why are three of the four examples listed, citing state legislation or regulation was only “sought” and not passed or simply withdrawn completely. Sounds to me like the title should have read “Underregulation Boosts Market-Driven Solutions in Dentistry”.

image
Posted By: GroupDentistryNow March 16, 2017
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) recently published a 12 page research paper entitled, ‘Overregulation Threatens Market-Driven Solutions in Dentistry’.  ALEC is America’s largest nonpartisan, voluntary membership organization of state legislators dedicated to the principles of limited government, free markets and federalism. Comprised of nearly one-quarter of the country’s state legislators and stakeholders from across the policy spectrum, ALEC members represent more than 60 million Americans and provide jobs to more than 30 million people in the United States.
In the paper, the author, Mia Palmieri Heck, discusses and analyzes the increasing regulatory and legislative efforts to restrict and even ban dental support organizations in several states.  The ALEC study points to the many benefits of dental support organizations, including increased access to care, lower cost of providing that care, and better patient outcomes when dentists are free from the distraction of non-clinical (support) activities. For a list of clinical (services only a licensed dentist can do) versus non-clinical activities (duties which may be provided by a non-dentist), please see graphic below.
Even with all of the aforementioned benefits, dental licensing boards in several states have tried to limit or restrict dentists’ ability to contract with a dental support organization through regulatory and legislative means.  The main function of a state dental licensing board should be to protect paients from harm, as well as to monitor, regulate, and oversee the licensing process.  The licensing board should not be in the business of creating anti-competitive regulations and legislation to benefit and protect the solo practice owners that may sit on the board.
Example of state overregulation of DSOs:
  • North Carolina – [2015] The Unites States Supreme Court ultimately confirmed the findings of a lower court that the NC Board of Dental Examiners had unreasonably restrained trade in violation of the federal antitrust laws.
  • Texas – [2014, 2015] The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners proposed new rules restricting the ability of dentists to enter into contracts with ‘unlicensed persons’ for non-clinical functions.  The board also tried to expand its authority to take disciplinary action against dentists who chose to contract with a DSO.  The board received numerous public comments and letters protesting these proposed rules, including a letter from the Federal Trade Commission.  These proposed rules were eventually withdrawn by the board.
  • Maryland – [2014, 2016] Maryland’s state board tried to adopt regulations making it nearly impossible for DSOs to operate in the state, even though dental support organizations have operated in Maryland for decades.  The MD administration did not approve these regulations, so the MD state dental association and board of dental examiners sought legislation restricting the business functions a DSO could provide.
  • Wisconsin – [2015]  The Wisconsin state dental association sought legislation that would give the dental board authority to regulate dental support organizations on matters related to non-clinical activities.  The bill did not pass mainly due to state legislators, many of whom are members of ALEC.

Mia Palmieri Heck
Heck is Director of ALEC’s Health and Human Services Task Force.  She leads the nationwide effort to promote free-market, pro-patient health care reforms at the state level. In her immediate past position she served as an executive at a Texas-based child and family services provider, where she led the strategic planning and program development efforts for the agency.
To review the entire study, which is the source for the majority of the content in this piece, click HERE.







See all of the ADSO tax returns here

Monday, March 13, 2017

Comfort Dental Agrees to Washington State Permanent Cease and Desist

 
By: Michael W Davis, DDS, Guest Contributor
Dr. Michael DavisDr. Michael W. Davis maintains a general dental practice in Santa Fe, NM. He serves as chairperson for Santa Fe District Dental Society Peer-Review. Dr. Davis also provides a fair amount of dental expert legal work for attorneys. 
 
 



Comfort Dental Group, et al, a Colorado corporate dental entity has signed and accepted a Consent Agreement (permanent cease and desist order) with the Washington State Department of Health, on February 28, 2017. Comfort Dental admits engaging in the unlicensed and unlawful practice of dentistry. Comfort Dental was active in the sales and management of so-called sub-franchised dental practices, outside the bounds of Washington statutes.

Unlicensed parties, and not duly licensed dentists of dental practices, were selecting dental laboratories for patients, dental supplies, office supplies, & janitorial services. The dental corporation's restrictive covenant on doctors was deemed overly restrictive and outside the bounds Washington statues. Further, Comfort Dental's restrictions on the ability of a doctor to transfer their practice ownership was also deemed unlawful. The 5% "royalty" fee Comfort Dental charged licensed doctors on gross collections was determined unlawful, as it allowed Comfort Dental an excessive beneficial ownership in dental practices.

Respondents of Comfort Dental agreed to Pay a fine of $340,000, agreed to the permanent cease and desist order to discontinue their unlicensed and unlawful practice of dentistry in Washington, and reform each of their Washington State dentist contracts to comply with state law.
Reporter's note: This outcome in Washington State, in which the dental profession, public and state government stood up for consumer rights, is in stark contrast to Colorado. In Colorado, the dental profession and state legislators capitulated to the interests of corporate dentistry and Comfort Dental.

Reporter's note: Here's an interesting facet to this story. If Comfort Dental fully complies w/ their consent agreement w/in an allotted time frame, their $340,000 fine will be reduced to $25,000. However, in public record evidence submitted in the earlier legal action of Drs Carl & Craig Bahr, verus Comfort Dental, et al. (case now settled & sealed), in an email from Comfort Dental founder & president Dr Rick Kushner, he stated that w/out control of the dental lab, Comfort Dental wouldn't be viable as it is today (loss of corporate control & money). It seems the Comfort Dental business model (as it exists today) may collapse, w/out control of the lab & mandatory lab utilization by franchisees (dentists). This is seemingly at distinct odds w/ expressed terms of the settlement w/ WA State.
Evidence of the earlier cited civil case clearly demonstrated problematic issues w/ the mandated dental laboratory, which was operated by Dr Kushner's brother. One might assume doctors would be free to select what dental lab operated in their patients' best interests. However, that's almost NEVER the case w/ corporate dentistry.
So, now it will come down to a serious effort at state enforcement. Is the WA State AG's office a paper tiger, or a true protector of the public interest & enforcer of the rule of law? We'll see..
Related: TOXIC TROIKA FOR DENTAL PATIENTS











Thursday, March 09, 2017

Lawyers battle over whether dental procedure was necessary for child who died

imageBy: Jennifer Kendall
Posted:Mar 08 2017 10:28PM CST
Updated:Mar 08 2017 10:28PM CST
Wednesday, lawyers argued in district court about whether a 14-month-old who died after a dental procedure in North Austin actually needed dental work done.
A medical examiner's report said Daisy Lynn Torres died due to complications of anesthesia, but part of the report has led to a defamation lawsuit against a forensic dentist
Read the entire report here


Dr. Michael Melanson was an employee of Austin Children's Dentistry, whose President is Brian J. Peters.
Austin Chilldrens Dentistry-Brian Peters-President-sos-tx
Searching the address Brian J. Peters has listed returns results for Southern Pecan Plantation Manufactured Housing Community, owned by Peters’ parents, Robert and Carol Peters.




Whistleblower claims Dental Authority used Restrictive Advertising Guidelines to try to Curb Overzealous Cosmetic Training Program

Special Report:

Did a Canadian Dental Authority have serious concerns about a training program that promoted Cosmetic Over-treatment of Patients and look the other way due to a business relationship?

Red Deer, Alberta, Canada- Former dental council member dentist-author Michael Zuk DDS is asking the Health Minister to look into concerns with connections between a harmful 'cosmetic dentist' training program in the USA, a Canadian dental lab and the Alberta dental authority. According to the general dentist, Canadian and American dentists were brainwashed into flying their patients to Las Vegas for irreversible and sometimes harmful cosmetic veneer makeovers where the professionals were unlicensed and unlikely to be covered by malpractice insurance. He claims the local authority looked the other way due to a close business relationship with the primary dental lab that profited from the additional porcelain work. The dentist was contacted by a victim who had complications after aesthetic treatment within this training program sharing that her complaint was ignored by the authority and this inspired him to speak out about the problem. The dental authority retaliated after Zuk published his book Confessions of a Former Cosmetic Dentist in 2010 with fears the truth would ‘harm the reputation of the dental profession.’

The dentist claims the dental authority decided to make an example of one dentist who had been a known attendee of the cosmetic training program in spite of the fact that she did the right thing in recommending a less aggressive treatment alternative of orthodontics instead of ‘instant ortho’ with veneers. The known risk of more aggressive crown/veneer preparations to straighten teeth is root canal complications, and when this occurred after the patient refused traditional orthodontics, the dental authority had the opportunity to indirectly address the concern. Dr. Zuk suggests the dental authority should known patients have the right to accept treatment alternatives with higher risks after they have been provided with the choices. No treatment is without risks and even orthodontics can result in damage to teeth so a exhaustive war against one ‘cosmetic dentist’ was unwarranted and an honest discussion within and outside the profession should have been made. 

A second indirect action against the wave of cosmetic dental mania was against the use of the term ‘cosmetic dentist’ and office trade names containing the words ‘cosmetic dentistry’. Another dentist was selected to be disciplined for this concern, which is usually considered a practice preference or area of interest and not professional misconduct. Again the dentist was found guilty and suspended.

The third attack related to cosmetic dentistry was against Dr. Zuk’s book claiming the authority did not protect the public from over-treatment and his promotion of a more conservative cosmetic treatment called ‘shorter term orthodontics’. The dentist was found guilty of professional misconduct and the complaint director who was also suing the dentist for $3M for criticism of her performance recommended a suspension of 5 years and costs of $270,000 even though no patient complaint was involved. While the council and appeal committee reduce the actual term to 12 months and approximately $176,000 CAN this was still an amount that would lead the author to appeal to the court system.

The problem with sponsored training courses was not isolated to the dental profession, and as an example physicians realized their treatment recommendations were affected by educational programs backed by certain pharmaceutical companies. Bias is a common problem with programs and research that supports the information may be tainted by financial interests. Besides cosmetic dentistry, most dental services are affected in some way by the promotions of the products and services within the dental industry including lasers and less exotic gizmos that may or may not make treatment safer, more affordable, faster or better.

So to summarize, the dental authority had a concern with a particular cosmetic training program, then suspended a dentist whose patient had a few non-life-threatening complications that were known to be relatively common with the treatment provided, then suspended a dentist who named his practice a ‘cosmetic’ dental office and then suspended a dentist who wrote about problems with cosmetic dentistry and promoted less aggressive alternatives that are used across the globe. The authority had published an internal document written by Dr. Gordon Christensen titled ‘I Have Had Enough’ which profiles the US prosthodontists concerns about the cosmetic dentistry becoming ‘a monster, promoting irreversible treatment on patients’ but the dental authority refused to admit that the public interest was more important than the integrity of the profession. 

In his latest e-book ‘The Ugly Truth about Cosmetic Dentistry’ currently available at no cost through a link on the website AlbertaDentalAssociationProblems.com, Dr. Zuk shares the connection between the dental authority and the suspect dental training program which, according to a malpractice lawyer in San Francisco and an expert witness, was associated with numerous cases of gross over-treatment of unsuspecting dental patients.

The dentist claims dental authorities had misgivings about this specific cosmetic training program but did not take any steps to warn the public, and this according to Dr. Zuk, has been confirmed in writing by a former high level executive from the dental authority. “Instead of taking this problem public, the dental authority addressed the concerns about aggressive promotion of veneer treatment with an elaborate mess of advertising guidelines that banned dentists from discussing the courses attended, use of the terms like ‘smile makeover’ and forbidding dentists from using before & after photos of dental treatment. The authority was clearly were more worried about harming the relationship with the dental lab owner who they awarded with an honorary membership in the dental association than they were with the harm caused to dental patients. The financial support of this large Canadian lab allowed the training program to reach out to dentists and patients across North America. While many patients were likely pleased with their new smiles, many could have been treated with less expensive and less risky alternatives with comparable results. Many cosmetic dentists are not treating patients with bleaching, bonding and braces rather than veneers. Veneer treatment can be the best or worst treatment choice, but the training program at the time was pushing porcelain as a cure-all and many patients were harmed physically and financially in the process,” says Zuk.

The outspoken dentist who appeared on an investigative television program CBC Marketplace- Money Where Your Mouth Is -where a 15 year-old girl was told by a different dental professional that she needed most of her health teeth ‘capped’ due to some sensitivity that was later treated successfully by Dr. Zuk with Sensodyne toothpastes. Zuk notified the provincial Health Minister and the Competition Bureau of Canada with numerous concerns with about the dental authority’s mismanagement, excessive advertising regulation that limits competition and lack of whistleblower protection. Dr. Zuk is planning a documentary on the subject and is interviewing patients who were flown to Las Vegas for cosmetic dental treatment during the 1990’s and dentists who attended the program and now regret some of the treatment that was promoted.

For more information contact Dr. Michael Zuk directly at 403-347-8008.